Tuesday, December 23, 2008

If I had a restaurant...

As I sat down to eat my lunch, my mind raced, searching for something interesting to think about. When I looked at how colorful my food was, I thought, "If I had a bunch of time and money, I'd open a restaurant." Because of the wide variety of colorful vegetables and copious whole grains, I thought I'd call it "WholeSum," and it'd follow my philosophy of eating and only have 4 seasonings (salt, soy sauce, miso, olive oil) and I'd play off the name and incorporate some silly mathematical puns into the decor and serve reasonably priced organic food that was fresh picked, preferably from an urban garden and....

Then I caught myself and thought, "so basically, I just want to force my personal philosophy onto others in the form of food. Hmm...." I then thought about all the times I've had conversations with food nuts about the restaurants we'd open, and I realized that we all did that; we all just want to express our values and have diners come lavish us with praise and bathe in our brilliance. "Ah, that Jeff is so right!"

How adorably egotistical. : )

Monday, December 22, 2008

A small epiphany about poverty

As I was preparing yet another business school application essay, I caught myself making an assumption; I suggested (incorrectly) that poverty is an easily addressed problem, because it is a simple lack of resources. It's just a matter of figuring out how to get the resources from the rich areas to the poor areas.

Now, I don't actually believe that, but I caught myself thinking it for a moment as I brainstormed the essay. Then it made me think -- that's a pretty common misconception, isn't it? I think it has implications in charitable giving. I have no evidence to back this up, nor the initiative to do the research, but I think that people donate to poverty-related charities in large amounts in part because it seems like a very effective use of the money. Why? Because poverty appears to be a simple problem of unequal distribution of resources. I have a lot, you have very little, so I'll give some to you and this problem will go away.

Of course, this simplistic thinking ignores the fact that charitable giving is non-sustainable and can often have the adverse effects of creating dependence and causing abandonment of productive activities. Then when charitable giving drops in an economic downturn, or when the program the poor people were receiving aid from is shut down by the government, things are worse than they were before, because while they were receiving charity, they reduced their self-reliant productive output, and now have to scramble to raise their incomes or face dire consequences. (To give a rather simplistic example to counter some simplistic thinking)

People are probably more hesitant to donate to causes like drug-user clinics because there is a natural suspicion that the money will not be as effective in solving the problem, in part because it's not a simple equation of more -> less. They also know that it's a more complex problem, involving various difficult-to-control factors, such as addictive behavior, socioeconomic inequality, and education. On the other hand, overseas poverty appears to be simple; just send the dollars (or food, or clothing, or whatever) where they don't have enough! There isn't as much questioning of efficacy of the program, because it's somewhere far away, and because the expectations are lower for immediate resolution of the problem because the donor thinks "it probably hasn't been solved yet because other people aren't as generous as I am!" (well, maybe I shouldn't be that cynical... It's a joke!)

But really, it's just like gangs, drugs, crime, or any other seemingly intractable social ill -- it can't be solved by just throwing money at it, however logical that solution may seem...

Lawns update

A little addendum to the lawns rant I wrote earlier. Julia found a really good article from the New Yorker that has 100x the info, 100x the clarity, and 100x the persuasiveness of my post. Check it out.

Also, Michael Pollan apparently had something to say about it a few years back, and here's a good movement: foodNotLawns.com (it's pretty similar to this idea I was scheming up a few months ago)

To sum it up: lawns are pointless and a waste of resources. Do something cool with yours!

Friday, December 19, 2008

Some lighter stuff

Here are some emails I sent recently. I thought I'd just paste 'em in here since it'd be easier than making a really nice blog post.

This one was to a friend to explain the EG conference in Monterey, which is not only "just like TED," but started by the guy who started TED and then sold it. It starts off with a reference to Nicholas Negroponte...

yeah, he was slick. he was looking like james bond, pimping a couple of ladies before we interrupted him. hehe. not really, he's totally cool. I tried to extract some wisdom in our short conversation, but all i got was that he wished he had spent a little less time working and a bit more with family. when my friend asked if he thinks he would have accomplished all he has if he did, he said, yeah probably. either way, working "a little less" would probably be "working 3 times as hard as i do now" for me. It was cool though cause he was relaxing and taking it easy, not worrying too much about networking or anything else. but i guess you can do that when you're a superstar. all the leads come to you.

other than that, the conference was amazing. really great to see people from all different perspectives there. i felt a little sheepish at first since i "snuck a free ride," but people were really welcoming since we were so inquisitive and excited abuot the whole thing. it's just like ted, but you pay way more attention since the dude is 15ft in front of you and steve wozniak is in the row behind. pretty nuts. I just feel stupid for not having a "cause" that i could get people excited about so they'd give me ideas and such. When they put the videos online i'll tell u which ones were good. a lot of times the really unexpected guys will be the best. this dude from the discovery channel was an amazing speaker. just nuts. all the people were nuts really. if you see anyone on that list u want me to tell u more about then i will.

oh yeah, we also chilled with tim feriss (4 hr workweek), who was practically our age but totally amazing. Having read the book, julia expected him to be arrogant, (i haven't read it so i didn't know) but he was pretty cool and actually enjoyed talking to us. we almost got him to come over to our house, but he got caught up somewhere else, and left us a really long message about how he was sorry he couldn't make it. crazy man. you're there and u're like a superstar.

amory lovins - amazing person. julia took a class with him at stanford (he was a guest lecturer), and he's apparently this amazing dude with photographic memory and a track record of getting stuff done. he's just way too smart. i'm so glad he's working on environmental issues, cause he's making an impact.

the illustrator (mark pachter) was amazing, josh bell's violin was really cool to see up close (but not as impressive as the recording i have with henryk c. -- i can explain in more detail later), the egyptian dude zahi hawass was nuts (everyone was laughing at/with him)

this "behavioral economist" dan auriley was really funny (and he came over to our house after), there was this super-girl entrepreneur (who made this headset that you can control a video console with, also came over to our house), and david pogue (NY times tech guy) reminded me of steven colbert. berkeley breathed (author of opus, the comic) was really dirty, and D'amboise was really artsy feeling, but a bit old to be talking for that long.

overall, crazy. not that i needed a motivational boost, but it made anything seem possible. everyone was amazing and so accomplished, yet at the same time, so human. talking to them afterwards reminded me that they're just people and that the change I hope to make is totally within reach, it'll just take time.

As a side note, I kinda wished some of these people were aiming their talents at slightly more "fruitful" projects instead of being the world's best dilletantes. But that's a side note.

anyways, the lesson is, stay motivated, you'll get there for sure

Interesting how often I use the word "crazy." Here's an email about a bike crash that I sent to friend who recently got in a very serious crash in Korea.
how are you doing? i haven't heard much since kevin's last update. have you been moving around at all? i see you keep evading me on chat

i wanted to share a funny story. 2 days ago, i went out to bike on a cloudy day. i went up the usual route up sepulveda then decided to go down coldwater since it start to rain lightly. i was being really careful, but around the last turn, just as it was straightening out, there was flash of 3 instants. one was the front tire slipping out. 2 was the bike instantly metamorphosing from an extention of my body to an uncontrollable mass of aluminum, and me flying above it. 3 was my face smashing into the ground.

i got up and was scared i really hurt myself, so someone called the fire dept, which came in 2 minutes (from the top of the hill). they ambulanced me out just in case, and i got some stitches and xrays at sherman oaks hospital (the one with the big red cross that u can see from mulholland). i guess i got lucky, but damn, it's so easy to make a mistake...

i thought of u for most of the time, of course. i'm doing better now, but my arm hurts and it's tough to move it. anyways, here's a picture. thought u'd enjoy.

i hope things are lovely over there, and that you're enjoying the incredible gratitude you can only experience when recovering. don't lose that sense even after it's better. life is great.

much love (to kevin and mom too)


And here's the pic I attached. Somebody called me "jamface"

Monday, December 15, 2008

Expectations of sadness

When a Jewish person dies, family members in mourning “sit shiva,” the practice of inviting community members over each evening for one week to say prayers for the dead and comfort the family. Traditionally, the prayers cannot be performed unless a group of ten people or more, known as a minyan, is present at the home.

Immediately after losing a family member, most people are understandably devastated. Without an outside voice, the mood inside the home is almost exclusively that of sadness and loss. Each family member’s gloom reinforces that of the others. The general silence directs family members’ focus inward, where thoughts are invariably dominated by the recent loss. Recovery is long and slow.

The genius behind the shiva concept is lies in its pragmatism. By formalizing visits to the home for every day immediately after death, shiva ensures mourners have little time to sink in to silent despair because they are too busy entertaining guests, who themselves serve to enliven the general mood by providing sympathetic words, fresh perspectives, and lighthearted distractions. The concept of the minyan provides a good turnout because community members are driven to attend by the fear that prayer services will be cancelled if they stay at home. After completion of the prayers, a boisterous, lively conversation ensues, driven by the large crowd.

As for my experience, my sadness from mom’s death has been surprisingly manageable; meditation, staying positive, and expressing love and happiness for mom before she left have each contributed to my stability. My father doesn’t seem to be coping as easily. With some thought, the disparity is quite reasonable. Everyone subconsciously assumes that grandparents and parents will die first, but, barring a large age difference, nobody expects a significant other to die. A slightly unrealistic denial prevents those thoughts from ever carrying any serious weight, leaving us completely unprepared when it happens, even though it is inevitable for one member of the couple.

As a result, many people come over at all times of day to try to lift dad’s spirits. Many are adept at mixing comforting words with happy stories about mom. Others seem to talk more about themselves, but at least temporarily distract dad from his brooding thoughts. However, most seem unaware that their selfless objectives are sometimes in subtle conflict with the outcomes of their actions.

Most people expect us to be in a perpetual state of profound sadness (or at least any time they visit). However, that’s just not the case; nobody can stay in a state of gloom permanently. A problem arises when people attempt to commiserate with or console the mourners when they aren’t even feeling sad, because the only socially acceptable response for the mourner is to revive the sadness so as to graciously accept the condolences. The end result is the revival and reinforcement of sadness, which prolongs the mourning period – hardly a practical approach to helping someone cope.

To give an example, dad will be in a fairly good mood after doing some cleaning. A friend then comes over and, in a fully heartfelt manner, expresses her condolences. She says that he must be feeling so devastated. Although dad was feeling fine, he does not want to appear insensitive or detached, so he says that yes, he is in shock. He cites specific examples of the magnitude of his sadness (inability to sleep, feelings of confusion and loss), and in the process reminds himself of these feelings. His mood begins to shift back towards mourning. Worst of all, just as repeating a lesson solidifies its effect on the mind, so too will the sadness more firmly entrench itself in his long-term mood with each expression of mourning.

There is no doubt that everyone wants to help. None of our friends want to see us suffer. But due to the subtle effects of the mind, attempting to commiserate with a mourner may actually have the negative effect of prolonging suffering. While far from perfect, my personal method would be to greet the mourner with a smile and try to keep the conversation as cheery as possible, all the while making an effort to read his mood. I’d rather try to lead him to a brighter day than force him to relive his sadness.

After all, life goes on…

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Goodbye to mom

I read this at mom's funeral, but it was a little incoherent since someone made changes and I didn't have time to review them. Anyways, here it is



I tried to think of something coherent or poetic to say, but nothing really came to mind. To be honest, I’m confused as to how I should feel. This is the first and last time I will experience this situation. But since I don’t really have any wise words to say, I’ll just tell you what I know: about the way I feel.

I’m struck by the rather odd position I’m in. my actual feelings are at odds with the way that I expected I would feel in this situation. I thought I would be drowned in sorrow, unable to stand or speak. I thought I would be in a terrible shock. But I’m not. That sense of sadness hasn’t come at all. Instead, I’ve been focusing on the positive: I’m happy that her death was such a comfortable one, without much pain or agony. I’m happy that we – her family and friends – were able to be with her for the whole duration. Many people don’t get that opportunity when they go. I’m happy that she accomplished what meant most to her: raising her sons well. I don’t see much to be sad about

The notion that it was more tragic because she was so young and healthy doesn’t really sit well with me. It’s based on the idea of life expectancy, the assumption that we will all live at least until the statistical average. In reality, it’s just a meaningless number. In reality, we could die at any time at any age from any number of causes. And people do. As a personal philosophy, I remind myself often that today could be my last.

Now, that idea might sound fairly pessimistic and dark, but thinking it through results in an extraordinarily positive outlook. With the wrong mindset, living to 120 years old could be a miserable experience. If moment after moment, our lives were filled with sadness or anger, life would hardly be worth living to any age. The idea that today could be my last reminds me that this life is finite, that there is certainly an end. It reminds me that I have to live each day happily and with meaning. The result is not to sit in a cloud of gloom, focusing only on the fact that I will die, but that I make an effort every day to improve the way I perceive things, and that I try to make a meaningful contribution to the lives of those around me. I might not ever be 100% happy, but making an effort is the only way that I know that could improve things.

Mom was not always optimistic and happy; she definitely had her share of unhappy times. But during her last few months, when things were the toughest, I saw her make an effort to express positive feelings and live life well. Little by little, things were improving. She was making the best of her time. That’s why today isn’t sad. That’s why, today, I’m happy.



(mom and dad in Koganei Park, April 2008)

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Don't worry

Life may be confusing or hard, but it's only temporary.

Goodnight mom